Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Policy, Politics, & Nursing Practice
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sochalski, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Sochalski, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Quality of Care, Nurse Staffing, and Patient Outcomes

Julie Sochalski, PhD, RN, FANN

Center for Health Outcomes and Policy Research at the University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics at Pennsylvania.

Widespread reports of declining levels of quality of care and patient safety in hospitals, an escalation in calls for legislation mandating minimum nurse staffing ratios, and growing levels of nurse burnout and a looming nursing shortage have focused attention on the working conditions that nurses face and their implications for patient outcomes. This article reports on the preliminary results of an international study on how nurse staffing levels and the nursing practice environment affect the quality of care and patient outcomes in hospitals. Surveys of staff nurses working in acute care hospitals in Pennsylvania reveal that one out of every five staff nurses reported the quality of care on their unit as fair or poor. Workload played a role in these quality assessments, but it was the consequences of workload, such as the reports of unfinished nursing at the end of the last shift and the frequency of adverse events among patients, that played a much more prominent role.

Policy, Politics, & Nursing Practice, Vol. 2, No. 1, 9-18 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/152715440100200103


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Qual Saf Health CareHome page
A Schmid-Mazzoccoli, L A Hoffman, G A Wolf, M B Happ, and M A Devita
The use of medical emergency teams in medical and surgical patients: impact of patient, nurse and organisational characteristics
Qual. Saf. Health Care, October 1, 2008; 17(5): 377 - 381.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Crit CareHome page
M. Manojlovich and B. DeCicco
Healthy Work Environments, Nurse-Physician Communication, and Patients' Outcomes
Am. J. Crit. Care., November 1, 2007; 16(6): 536 - 543.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]