Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

SAGETRACK

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Policy, Politics, & Nursing Practice
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mech, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Mech, A.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Supreme Court Update

Ann Mech, JD, MS, RN

The 2002-2003 term of the U.S. Supreme Court promises another series of cases involving disputes related to managed care and health insurance benefits. As in its previous term, the Court is faced with another case testing the applicability of state insurance laws to health insurance plans falling under the jurisdiction of the federal Employee Retirement and Income Security Act (ERISA) of 1974.

Key Words: Supreme Court • health maintenance organizationa: managed care • ERISA • health insurance plans

Policy, Politics, & Nursing Practice, Vol. 4, No. 2, 144-146 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/1527154403004002008
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?