| Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
The Impact of Nurse Turnover on Patient, Nurse, and System Outcomes: A Pilot Study and Focus for a Multicenter International StudyUniversity of Toronto and Canadian Health Services Research Foundation/Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CHSRF/CIHR) National Chair in Nursing Human Resources.
Canadian Association of Schools of Nursing (CASN), Ottawa, Canada
Victorian Order of Nurses (VON) Canada, based in Ottawa, Canada
Faculty of Social Sciences and Health Care, Queen Margaret University College, Edinburgh, Scotland
Centre for Health Services Management, University of Technology, Sydney, Australia
Centre for Mental Health Research, Policy and Service Development, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, New Zealand
School of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Western Ontario, in London, Ontario
School of Nursing, Faculty of Medical & Health Sciences, University of Auckland, New Zealand
Columbia University School of Nursing, New York, New York Research about the economic impact of nurse turnover has been compromised by a lack of consistent definitions and measurement. This article describes a study that was designed to refine a methodology to examine the costs associated with nurse turnover. Nursing unit managers responded to a survey that contained items relating to budgeted full-time equivalents, new hires, and turnover, as well as direct and indirect costs. The highest mean direct cost was incurred through temporary replacements, whereas the highest indirect cost was decreased initial productivity of the new hire. The study allowed the identification of the availability of data and where further refinement of data definition of variables is needed. The results provided significant evidence to justify increased emphasis on nurse retention strategies and the creation of healthy work environments for nurses.
Key Words: nurse turnover turnover cost costing methodology international research
Policy, Politics, & Nursing Practice, Vol. 7, No. 3,
169-179 (2006) |
|||