This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Balk, K. G. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Balk, K. G. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Recommended Newborn Screening Policy Change for the NICU Infant

Johns Hopkins University, National Institutes of Health

Newborn screening (NBS), the practice by which infants are tested for certain genetic and metabolic conditions by heel prick 3 to 5 days after birth, has been a beneficial and cost-effective public health strategy. Many of the screened conditions present in the first 2 weeks of life and are life threatening. Because of the risk of metabolic acidosis, seizures, coma, neurological devastation, or death, NBS is essential for prompt diagnosis and treatment, including dietary, hormonal, and other interventions. However, due to the fact that aminoglycosides, blood transfusions, nothing by mouth status, and the presence of heparinized solutions all potentially affect the screening results, NBS guidelines in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) ought to be changed to obviate inaccurate results. These guidelines, originally initiated by nurses at the Johns Hopkins NICU due to the missed diagnosis and death of an infant, include screening the day of birth prior to any interventions, performing the screen at 1 and/or 2 weeks of life, and repeating screening as needed.

Key Words: newborn screening • neonatal intensive care unit • policy

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?