Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Policy, Politics, & Nursing Practice
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Welton, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Dismuke, C. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Welton, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Dismuke, C. E.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Testing an Inpatient Nursing Intensity Billing Model

John M. Welton, PhD, RN

Medical University of South Carolina

Clara E. Dismuke, PhD

Medical University of South Carolina

There has been growing concern about the costs and intensity of inpatient nursing care, which consumes more than 40% of hospital direct costs and $165 billion each year. Allocating nursing labor as an average cost per patient and charged as room and board creates cost compression, distorts hospital payment, and hides the economic value of nurses. This article examines a method for adjusting daily room charges using nursing intensity weights assigned by the diagnosis related group. In a test using claims data from 286 hospitals in four states representing 1,856,256 patient discharges in 2002, the nursing intensity adjustment improved explained total cost variance by 8.5% for adult all payer patients (R2 = .4448 vs. .4825) and 9.4% for Medicare only patients (R2 = .4387 vs. .4798) compared to unadjusted days. This article discusses unbundling inpatient nursing care intensity and charges from room and board and recommends implementing this billing process at all U.S. hospitals.

Key Words: nursing care • nursing intensity • prospective payment system • reimbursement • hospital charges • hospital costs

Policy, Politics, & Nursing Practice, Vol. 9, No. 2, 103-111 (2008)
DOI: 10.1177/1527154408320045
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?